Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural

Malawi
0.0317 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0324 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Malawi rank
43rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
41st

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural over time

  • Malawi
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.010.020.03196119902019

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0324 units per square kilometre against 0.0317 units per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0007 units per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 43rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 194 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0036 units per square kilometre 0.0125 units per square kilometre 0.0089 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0057 units per square kilometre 0.0179 units per square kilometre 0.0122 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0079 units per square kilometre 0.0167 units per square kilometre 0.0089 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0097 units per square kilometre 0.0186 units per square kilometre 0.0089 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0139 units per square kilometre 0.0249 units per square kilometre 0.011 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0246 units per square kilometre 0.0305 units per square kilometre 0.0059 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural, Malawi or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0324 units per square kilometre against 0.0317 units per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural between Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0007 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural?
Malawi ranks 43rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/malawi/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/malawi/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 10,367 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.