French Polynesia vs Iceland: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural

French Polynesia
0.0029 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Iceland
0.0028 units per square kilometre
in 2019
French Polynesia rank
170th
Iceland rank
171st

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Iceland
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119902019

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.0029 units per square kilometre against 0.0028 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 170th and Iceland ranks 171st of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 units per square kilometre 0.0016 units per square kilometre 0.0009 units per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.002 units per square kilometre 0.0019 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.0027 units per square kilometre 0.0018 units per square kilometre 0.0009 units per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.0028 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.003 units per square kilometre 0.0028 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.0029 units per square kilometre 0.0028 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural, French Polynesia or Iceland?
French Polynesia, at 0.0029 units per square kilometre against 0.0028 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural between French Polynesia and Iceland?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Iceland?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do French Polynesia and Iceland rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural?
French Polynesia ranks 170th and Iceland ranks 171st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Iceland: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/iceland/">French Polynesia vs Iceland: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 10,367 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.