How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Serbia?

14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural

Cuba

0.0255 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Serbia

0.0266 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Cuba rank

59th

Serbia rank

56th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural over time

Cuba
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.0266 units per square kilometre against 0.0255 units per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0011 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Cuba ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 56th of 194 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0238 units per square kilometre	0.0324 units per square kilometre	0.0086 units per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.0261 units per square kilometre	0.0289 units per square kilometre	0.0028 units per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural, Cuba or Serbia?: Serbia, at 0.0266 units per square kilometre against 0.0255 units per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural between Cuba and Serbia?: 0.0011 units per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Serbia?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Cuba and Serbia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural?: Cuba ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 56th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/cuba/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/cuba/serbia/">Cuba vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 194 places, 10,367 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 28 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.