Burkina Faso vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural

Burkina Faso
0.0279 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Guatemala
0.0298 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
48th
Guatemala rank
45th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Guatemala
00.010.020.03196119902019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0298 units per square kilometre against 0.0279 units per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0019 units per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 48th and Guatemala ranks 45th of 194 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.005 units per square kilometre 0.0078 units per square kilometre 0.0028 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.006 units per square kilometre 0.0101 units per square kilometre 0.0042 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.0089 units per square kilometre 0.0133 units per square kilometre 0.0044 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.0122 units per square kilometre 0.0173 units per square kilometre 0.0051 units per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0185 units per square kilometre 0.0211 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0252 units per square kilometre 0.0281 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural, Burkina Faso or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0298 units per square kilometre against 0.0279 units per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural between Burkina Faso and Guatemala?
0.0019 units per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guatemala?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and Guatemala rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - agricultural?
Burkina Faso ranks 48th and Guatemala ranks 45th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/guatemala/">Burkina Faso vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 10,367 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.