Cuba vs Chinese Taipei: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation

Cuba
1,500
in 2050
Chinese Taipei
1,286
in 2050
Cuba rank
39th
Chinese Taipei rank
42nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation over time

  • Cuba
  • Chinese Taipei
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196120052050

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1,500 against 1,286 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 214.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Chinese Taipei's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.

Cuba ranks 39th and Chinese Taipei ranks 42nd of 118 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
1960s 731.51 3,989 3,258 Chinese Taipei
1970s 1,376 3,869 2,494 Chinese Taipei
1980s 1,218 2,925 1,706 Chinese Taipei
1990s 1,340 1,948 608.51 Chinese Taipei
2000s 1,350 1,420 70.09 Chinese Taipei
2010s 1,226 1,346 120.81 Chinese Taipei
2030s 1,303 1,447 144.4 Chinese Taipei
2050s 1,500 1,286 214.16 Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - rice cultivation, Cuba or Chinese Taipei?
Cuba, at 1,500 against 1,286 in Chinese Taipei as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - rice cultivation between Cuba and Chinese Taipei?
214, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Chinese Taipei?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Cuba and Chinese Taipei rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - rice cultivation?
Cuba ranks 39th and Chinese Taipei ranks 42nd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Chinese Taipei: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-rice-cultivation/cuba/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-rice-cultivation/cuba/taiwan/">Cuba vs Chinese Taipei: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
118 places, 6,718 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).