Eswatini vs Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice
Eswatini
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Eswatini rank
102nd
Sudan rank
103rd
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 102nd and Sudan ranks 103rd of 117 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - rice, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - rice between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - rice?
- Eswatini ranks 102nd and Sudan ranks 103rd of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.