El Salvador vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management

El Salvador
109.05
in 2050
Rwanda
130.38
in 2050
El Salvador rank
128th
Rwanda rank
125th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management over time

  • El Salvador
  • Rwanda
255075100125196120052050

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 130.38 against 109.05 in El Salvador, a difference of 21.33.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 125th of 192 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 49.52 19.83 29.69 El Salvador
1970s 52.16 25.7 26.46 El Salvador
1980s 48.03 27.23 20.8 El Salvador
1990s 49.41 25.94 23.47 El Salvador
2000s 58.09 49.36 8.74 El Salvador
2010s 49.36 86.19 36.83 Rwanda
2030s 85.05 95.37 10.32 Rwanda
2050s 109.05 130.38 21.33 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - manure management, El Salvador or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 130.38 against 109.05 in El Salvador as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - manure management between El Salvador and Rwanda?
21.33, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Rwanda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do El Salvador and Rwanda rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - manure management?
El Salvador ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 125th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-manure-management/el-salvador/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-manure-management/el-salvador/rwanda/">El Salvador vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).