New Caledonia vs Paraguay: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure

New Caledonia
0.0012 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Paraguay
0.0011 units per square kilometre
in 2019
New Caledonia rank
119th
Paraguay rank
122nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Paraguay
00.0010.0010.0010.0010.001196119902019

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0012 units per square kilometre against 0.0011 units per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 119th and Paraguay ranks 122nd of 190 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0009 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0009 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0012 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.001 units per square kilometre 0.0009 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.001 units per square kilometre 0.0009 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.0011 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - manure, New Caledonia or Paraguay?
New Caledonia, at 0.0012 units per square kilometre against 0.0011 units per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - manure between New Caledonia and Paraguay?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Paraguay?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do New Caledonia and Paraguay rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - manure?
New Caledonia ranks 119th and Paraguay ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Paraguay: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-manure-management-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-manure-management-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/paraguay/">New Caledonia vs Paraguay: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.