Faroe Islands vs Mozambique: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC

Faroe Islands
0.0147 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mozambique
0.014 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Faroe Islands rank
145th
Mozambique rank
147th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Mozambique
00.0050.010.015196119902019

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 0.0147 units per square kilometre against 0.014 units per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0007 units per square kilometre.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 145th and Mozambique ranks 147th of 206 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0164 units per square kilometre 0.0017 units per square kilometre 0.0147 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 0.0153 units per square kilometre 0.0021 units per square kilometre 0.0132 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 0.0145 units per square kilometre 0.0021 units per square kilometre 0.0124 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0.015 units per square kilometre 0.0109 units per square kilometre 0.0042 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 0.0151 units per square kilometre 0.0121 units per square kilometre 0.003 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.0148 units per square kilometre 0.0131 units per square kilometre 0.0017 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc, Faroe Islands or Mozambique?
Faroe Islands, at 0.0147 units per square kilometre against 0.014 units per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc between Faroe Islands and Mozambique?
0.0007 units per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Mozambique?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Faroe Islands and Mozambique rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc?
Faroe Islands ranks 145th and Mozambique ranks 147th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Mozambique: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/mozambique/">Faroe Islands vs Mozambique: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.