El Salvador vs Puerto Rico: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC

El Salvador
0.0747 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Puerto Rico
0.0711 units per square kilometre
in 2019
El Salvador rank
37th
Puerto Rico rank
38th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC over time

  • El Salvador
  • Puerto Rico
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119902019

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0747 units per square kilometre against 0.0711 units per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0036 units per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 37th and Puerto Rico ranks 38th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0999 units per square kilometre 0.1011 units per square kilometre 0.0013 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0.1005 units per square kilometre 0.1122 units per square kilometre 0.0117 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 0.0924 units per square kilometre 0.1111 units per square kilometre 0.0188 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0.1039 units per square kilometre 0.0878 units per square kilometre 0.016 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.1104 units per square kilometre 0.0771 units per square kilometre 0.0334 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0869 units per square kilometre 0.0736 units per square kilometre 0.0132 units per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc, El Salvador or Puerto Rico?
El Salvador, at 0.0747 units per square kilometre against 0.0711 units per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc between El Salvador and Puerto Rico?
0.0036 units per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Puerto Rico?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do El Salvador and Puerto Rico rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc?
El Salvador ranks 37th and Puerto Rico ranks 38th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Puerto Rico: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/puerto-rico-us/">El Salvador vs Puerto Rico: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.