Ecuador vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Emissions on
Ecuador
0.0005 units per person
in 2019
Serbia
0.0005 units per person
in 2019
Ecuador rank
78th
Serbia rank
81st
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Emissions on over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0005 units per person against 0.0005 units per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 81st of 208 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0008 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0002 units per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0005 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - emissions on, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 0.0005 units per person against 0.0005 units per person in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - emissions on between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0 units per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - emissions on?
- Ecuador ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 81st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Emissions on agricultural land, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Emissions on agricultural land divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.