Costa Rica vs Lesotho: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture

Costa Rica
593.59
in 2050
Lesotho
656.77
in 2050
Costa Rica rank
104th
Lesotho rank
102nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Lesotho
4006008001.0k196120052050

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 656.77 against 593.59 in Costa Rica, a difference of 63.18.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 104th and Lesotho ranks 102nd of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Lesotho in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 487.33 347.57 139.75 Costa Rica
1970s 714.76 412.64 302.12 Costa Rica
1980s 912.43 456.4 456.03 Costa Rica
1990s 721.73 434.94 286.79 Costa Rica
2000s 463.36 467.51 4.15 Lesotho
2010s 506.54 437.99 68.55 Costa Rica
2030s 547.55 571.65 24.09 Lesotho
2050s 593.59 656.77 63.18 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure left on pasture, Costa Rica or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 656.77 against 593.59 in Costa Rica as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure left on pasture between Costa Rica and Lesotho?
63.18, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lesotho?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Costa Rica and Lesotho rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure left on pasture?
Costa Rica ranks 104th and Lesotho ranks 102nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Lesotho: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-manure-left-on-pasture/costa-rica/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-manure-left-on-pasture/costa-rica/lesotho/">Costa Rica vs Lesotho: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).