Pakistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture

Pakistan
3.43 % change on previous year
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
3.6 % change on previous year
in 2019
Pakistan rank
26th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
23rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Pakistan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-10010196219902019

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.6 % change on previous year against 3.43 % change on previous year in Pakistan, a difference of 0.17 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 26th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 23rd of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.94 % change on previous year -2.72 % change on previous year 5.66 % change on previous year Pakistan
1970s 4.18 % change on previous year 0.82 % change on previous year 3.36 % change on previous year Pakistan
1980s 2.56 % change on previous year 2.12 % change on previous year 0.4377 % change on previous year Pakistan
1990s 2.41 % change on previous year 3.36 % change on previous year 0.9456 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 2.94 % change on previous year -2.13 % change on previous year 5.07 % change on previous year Pakistan
2010s 3.53 % change on previous year 0.5588 % change on previous year 2.97 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure left on pasture, Pakistan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.6 % change on previous year against 3.43 % change on previous year in Pakistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure left on pasture between Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.17 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
How do Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure left on pasture?
Pakistan ranks 26th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 23rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-manure-left-on-pasture-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-manure-left-on-pasture-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Pakistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,140 data points, 1962–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.