Angola vs Chinese Taipei: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils

Angola
403.03
in 2050
Chinese Taipei
400.4
in 2050
Angola rank
68th
Chinese Taipei rank
70th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils over time

  • Angola
  • Chinese Taipei
0100200300400196120052050

How they compare

Angola currently reports 403.03 against 400.4 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 2.63.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.

Angola ranks 68th and Chinese Taipei ranks 70th of 192 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Chinese Taipei in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
1960s 42.31 115.4 73.09 Chinese Taipei
1970s 58.05 143.75 85.7 Chinese Taipei
1980s 85.89 244.85 158.96 Chinese Taipei
1990s 95.01 367.29 272.28 Chinese Taipei
2000s 134.3 333.87 199.57 Chinese Taipei
2010s 294.4 287.19 7.21 Angola
2030s 260.5 380.12 119.62 Chinese Taipei
2050s 403.03 400.4 2.63 Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure applied to soils, Angola or Chinese Taipei?
Angola, at 403.03 against 400.4 in Chinese Taipei as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure applied to soils between Angola and Chinese Taipei?
2.63, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chinese Taipei?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Angola and Chinese Taipei rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - manure applied to soils?
Angola ranks 68th and Chinese Taipei ranks 70th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Chinese Taipei: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-manure-applied-to-soils/angola/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-manure-applied-to-soils/angola/taiwan/">Angola vs Chinese Taipei: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).