Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per

Mauritius
0.0691 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0684 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mauritius rank
72nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
73rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.020.040.060.08196119902019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0691 units per square kilometre against 0.0684 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0007 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 72nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 73rd of 206 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0699 units per square kilometre 0.0172 units per square kilometre 0.0526 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0665 units per square kilometre 0.0214 units per square kilometre 0.0451 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0691 units per square kilometre 0.0255 units per square kilometre 0.0436 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0781 units per square kilometre 0.04 units per square kilometre 0.0381 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0657 units per square kilometre 0.0495 units per square kilometre 0.0163 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0676 units per square kilometre 0.0645 units per square kilometre 0.0031 units per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per, Mauritius or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Mauritius, at 0.0691 units per square kilometre against 0.0684 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per between Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0007 units per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per?
Mauritius ranks 72nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tanzania/">Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.