How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tuvalu?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Tuvalu: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per

Malta

0.2511 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Tuvalu

0.244 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Malta rank

9th

Tuvalu rank

10th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

Malta
Tuvalu

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.2511 units per square kilometre against 0.244 units per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0071 units per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 9th and Tuvalu ranks 10th of 206 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.1925 units per square kilometre	0.0912 units per square kilometre	0.1013 units per square kilometre	Malta
1970s	0.2385 units per square kilometre	0.0925 units per square kilometre	0.146 units per square kilometre	Malta
1980s	0.319 units per square kilometre	0.1328 units per square kilometre	0.1862 units per square kilometre	Malta
1990s	0.4167 units per square kilometre	0.2123 units per square kilometre	0.2044 units per square kilometre	Malta
2000s	0.3738 units per square kilometre	0.2264 units per square kilometre	0.1474 units per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	0.3 units per square kilometre	0.2383 units per square kilometre	0.0617 units per square kilometre	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per, Malta or Tuvalu?: Malta, at 0.2511 units per square kilometre against 0.244 units per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per between Malta and Tuvalu?: 0.0071 units per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tuvalu?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Malta and Tuvalu rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per?: Malta ranks 9th and Tuvalu ranks 10th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Tuvalu: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/malta/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/malta/tuvalu/">Malta vs Tuvalu: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.