How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tunisia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mali vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per

Mali

0.03 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Tunisia

0.0296 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Mali rank

136th

Tunisia rank

138th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

Mali
Tunisia

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0.03 units per square kilometre against 0.0296 units per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0004 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Mali ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 138th of 206 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mali	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0077 units per square kilometre	0.0176 units per square kilometre	0.01 units per square kilometre	Tunisia
1970s	0.0079 units per square kilometre	0.0218 units per square kilometre	0.0139 units per square kilometre	Tunisia
1980s	0.009 units per square kilometre	0.0214 units per square kilometre	0.0124 units per square kilometre	Tunisia
1990s	0.0134 units per square kilometre	0.0259 units per square kilometre	0.0125 units per square kilometre	Tunisia
2000s	0.0183 units per square kilometre	0.0296 units per square kilometre	0.0113 units per square kilometre	Tunisia
2010s	0.0257 units per square kilometre	0.0295 units per square kilometre	0.0038 units per square kilometre	Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per, Mali or Tunisia?: Mali, at 0.03 units per square kilometre against 0.0296 units per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per between Mali and Tunisia?: 0.0004 units per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tunisia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Mali and Tunisia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per?: Mali ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 138th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/mali/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/mali/tunisia/">Mali vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.