China vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per

China
0.0711 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0684 units per square kilometre
in 2019
China rank
71st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
73rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

  • China
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.020.040.060.08196119902019

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0711 units per square kilometre against 0.0684 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0027 units per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 71st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 73rd of 206 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0376 units per square kilometre 0.0172 units per square kilometre 0.0204 units per square kilometre China
1970s 0.048 units per square kilometre 0.0214 units per square kilometre 0.0265 units per square kilometre China
1980s 0.0563 units per square kilometre 0.0255 units per square kilometre 0.0308 units per square kilometre China
1990s 0.0698 units per square kilometre 0.04 units per square kilometre 0.0298 units per square kilometre China
2000s 0.0736 units per square kilometre 0.0495 units per square kilometre 0.0242 units per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0739 units per square kilometre 0.0645 units per square kilometre 0.0093 units per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per, China or Tanzania, United Republic of?
China, at 0.0711 units per square kilometre against 0.0684 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per between China and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0027 units per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do China and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per?
China ranks 71st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/china/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/china/tanzania/">China vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.