How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Sweden: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per

Chile

0.0146 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Sweden

0.0177 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Chile rank

162nd

Sweden rank

159th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

Chile
Sweden

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0177 units per square kilometre against 0.0146 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0031 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 162nd and Sweden ranks 159th of 206 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0119 units per square kilometre	0.0231 units per square kilometre	0.0112 units per square kilometre	Sweden
1970s	0.013 units per square kilometre	0.0208 units per square kilometre	0.0078 units per square kilometre	Sweden
1980s	0.0141 units per square kilometre	0.0202 units per square kilometre	0.0061 units per square kilometre	Sweden
1990s	0.016 units per square kilometre	0.0208 units per square kilometre	0.0048 units per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	0.0172 units per square kilometre	0.0187 units per square kilometre	0.0016 units per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	0.0151 units per square kilometre	0.0179 units per square kilometre	0.0028 units per square kilometre	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per, Chile or Sweden?: Sweden, at 0.0177 units per square kilometre against 0.0146 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per between Chile and Sweden?: 0.0031 units per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Chile and Sweden rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per?: Chile ranks 162nd and Sweden ranks 159th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sweden: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/">Chile vs Sweden: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.