How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eswatini?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per

Chad

0.0609 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Eswatini

0.0623 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Chad rank

85th

Eswatini rank

83rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

Chad
Eswatini

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0623 units per square kilometre against 0.0609 units per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0014 units per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 85th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 206 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0062 units per square kilometre	0.0488 units per square kilometre	0.0426 units per square kilometre	Eswatini
1970s	0.0061 units per square kilometre	0.0563 units per square kilometre	0.0502 units per square kilometre	Eswatini
1980s	0.0062 units per square kilometre	0.06 units per square kilometre	0.0538 units per square kilometre	Eswatini
1990s	0.0192 units per square kilometre	0.0644 units per square kilometre	0.0452 units per square kilometre	Eswatini
2000s	0.0298 units per square kilometre	0.0575 units per square kilometre	0.0276 units per square kilometre	Eswatini
2010s	0.0487 units per square kilometre	0.0605 units per square kilometre	0.0118 units per square kilometre	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per, Chad or Eswatini?: Eswatini, at 0.0623 units per square kilometre against 0.0609 units per square kilometre in Chad as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per between Chad and Eswatini?: 0.0014 units per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eswatini?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Chad and Eswatini rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per?: Chad ranks 85th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/chad/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/chad/eswatini/">Chad vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.