How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Malta?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

French Polynesia vs Malta: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per

French Polynesia

0.0002 units per person

in 2019

Malta

0.0002 units per person

in 2019

French Polynesia rank

172nd

Malta rank

170th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

French Polynesia
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0002 units per person against 0.0002 units per person in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 units per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 172nd and Malta ranks 170th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	French Polynesia	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0004 units per person	0.0002 units per person	0.0002 units per person	French Polynesia
1970s	0.0003 units per person	0.0002 units per person	0 units per person	French Polynesia
1980s	0.0002 units per person	0.0003 units per person	0.0001 units per person	Malta
1990s	0.0002 units per person	0.0004 units per person	0.0002 units per person	Malta
2000s	0.0002 units per person	0.0003 units per person	0.0001 units per person	Malta
2010s	0.0002 units per person	0.0002 units per person	0.0001 units per person	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per, French Polynesia or Malta?: Malta, at 0.0002 units per person against 0.0002 units per person in French Polynesia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per between French Polynesia and Malta?: 0 units per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Malta?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do French Polynesia and Malta rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - ipcc agriculture, per?: French Polynesia ranks 172nd and Malta ranks 170th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Malta: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-capita/french-polynesia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-capita/french-polynesia/malta/">French Polynesia vs Malta: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.