How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Naoero?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Naoero: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per

Equatorial Guinea

0 units per person

in 2019

Naoero

0 units per person

in 2019

Equatorial Guinea rank

189th

Naoero rank

187th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per over time

Equatorial Guinea
Naoero

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 units per person.

That makes Naoero's figure about 2.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th and Naoero ranks 187th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Naoero in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Naoero	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Equatorial Guinea
1970s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Equatorial Guinea
1980s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Equatorial Guinea
1990s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Naoero
2010s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per, Equatorial Guinea or Naoero?: Naoero, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per between Equatorial Guinea and Naoero?: 0 units per person, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Naoero?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Naoero rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th and Naoero ranks 187th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Naoero: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-agricultural-soils-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/naoero/">Equatorial Guinea vs Naoero: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 194 places, 10,367 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.