Guatemala vs Solomon Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation

Guatemala
0.3246
in 2050
Solomon Islands
0.1908
in 2050
Guatemala rank
100th
Solomon Islands rank
103rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation over time

  • Guatemala
  • Solomon Islands
00.20.40.60.81196120052050

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.3246 against 0.1908 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.1338.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.7 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 100th and Solomon Islands ranks 103rd of 118 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2846 0.073 0.2117 Guatemala
1970s 0.3691 0.2943 0.0748 Guatemala
1980s 0.4286 0.4846 0.056 Solomon Islands
1990s 0.3909 0.1219 0.269 Guatemala
2000s 0.3144 0.1979 0.1165 Guatemala
2010s 0.3144 0.3453 0.0309 Solomon Islands
2030s 0.2944 0.1904 0.104 Guatemala
2050s 0.3246 0.1908 0.1338 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, Guatemala or Solomon Islands?
Guatemala, at 0.3246 against 0.1908 in Solomon Islands as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation between Guatemala and Solomon Islands?
0.1338, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Solomon Islands?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Guatemala and Solomon Islands rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation?
Guatemala ranks 100th and Solomon Islands ranks 103rd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Solomon Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-rice-cultivation/guatemala/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-rice-cultivation/guatemala/solomon-islands/">Guatemala vs Solomon Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
118 places, 6,718 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).