Eswatini vs Syrian Arab Republic: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation

Eswatini
0.0113
in 2050
Syrian Arab Republic
0.0056
in 1996
Eswatini rank
111th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
112th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation over time

  • Eswatini
  • Syrian Arab Republic
00.250.50.751196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0113 against 0.0056 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.0057.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.0 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 111th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 112th of 118 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1634 0.2981 0.1347 Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 0.1266 0.0891 0.0375 Eswatini
1980s 0.0445 0.0056 0.0389 Eswatini
1990s 0.0167 0.0053 0.0114 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, Eswatini or Syrian Arab Republic?
Eswatini, at 0.0113 against 0.0056 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation between Eswatini and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.0057, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Syrian Arab Republic?
36 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1996.
How do Eswatini and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation?
Eswatini ranks 111th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 112th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Syrian Arab Republic: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-rice-cultivation/eswatini/syrian-arab-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-rice-cultivation/eswatini/syrian-arab-republic/">Eswatini vs Syrian Arab Republic: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
118 places, 6,718 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).