Belize vs Papua New Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation

Belize
0.1094
in 2050
Papua New Guinea
0.0808
in 2050
Belize rank
107th
Papua New Guinea rank
108th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation over time

  • Belize
  • Papua New Guinea
0.050.10.150.2196120052050

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0.1094 against 0.0808 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0286.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.4 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Belize ranks 107th and Papua New Guinea ranks 108th of 118 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0476 0.1193 0.0718 Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.0928 0.1168 0.024 Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0768 0.0615 0.0152 Belize
1990s 0.127 0.0826 0.0444 Belize
2000s 0.1077 0.0952 0.0125 Belize
2010s 0.0971 0.0958 0.0013 Belize
2030s 0.1025 0.0806 0.0219 Belize
2050s 0.1094 0.0808 0.0286 Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, Belize or Papua New Guinea?
Belize, at 0.1094 against 0.0808 in Papua New Guinea as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation between Belize and Papua New Guinea?
0.0286, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Papua New Guinea?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Belize and Papua New Guinea rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation?
Belize ranks 107th and Papua New Guinea ranks 108th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Papua New Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-rice-cultivation/belize/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-rice-cultivation/belize/papua-new-guinea/">Belize vs Papua New Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
118 places, 6,718 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).