Solomon Islands vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management, per square
Solomon Islands
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
142nd
South Sudan rank
140th
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management, per square over time
- Solomon Islands
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 142nd and South Sudan ranks 140th of 190 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - manure management, per square, Solomon Islands or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - manure management, per square between Solomon Islands and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - manure management, per square?
- Solomon Islands ranks 142nd and South Sudan ranks 140th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.