Papua New Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Papua New Guinea
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
184th
Saudi Arabia rank
186th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Saudi Arabia
00000196119902019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.6 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 184th and Saudi Arabia ranks 186th of 206 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Papua New Guinea or Saudi Arabia?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Papua New Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
0 units per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Papua New Guinea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
Papua New Guinea ranks 184th and Saudi Arabia ranks 186th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/saudi-arabia/">Papua New Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.