Japan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Japan
0.0016 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0016 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Japan rank
66th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
64th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • Japan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119902019

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.0016 units per square kilometre against 0.0016 units per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 66th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 64th of 206 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.002 units per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.0022 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0017 units per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.0022 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.0021 units per square kilometre 0.0009 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.0018 units per square kilometre 0.0012 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.0016 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Japan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.0016 units per square kilometre against 0.0016 units per square kilometre in Japan as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Japan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Japan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
Japan ranks 66th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 64th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/japan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/japan/tanzania/">Japan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.