Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Congo
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Congo rank
171st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
170th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • Congo
  • Sao Tome and Principe
000000196119902019

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Congo ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 170th of 206 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Congo and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
Congo ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 170th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.