Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Jordan
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
169th
Jordan rank
166th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Jordan
0000196119902019

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 169th and Jordan ranks 166th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Democratic Republic of Congo or Jordan?
Jordan, at 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 169th and Jordan ranks 166th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/jordan/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.