Central African Republic vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Central African Republic
0.0006 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tunisia
0.0005 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
140th
Tunisia rank
143rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Tunisia
0000.0010.001196119902019

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0006 units per square kilometre against 0.0005 units per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 140th and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Central African Republic or Tunisia?
Central African Republic, at 0.0006 units per square kilometre against 0.0005 units per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Central African Republic and Tunisia?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Tunisia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
Central African Republic ranks 140th and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/tunisia/">Central African Republic vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.