How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Kuwait?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs Kuwait: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Bhutan

0.0004 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Kuwait

0.0004 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Bhutan rank

152nd

Kuwait rank

151st

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

Bhutan
Kuwait

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0.0004 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 152nd and Kuwait ranks 151st of 206 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	Kuwait	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	Bhutan
1970s	0.0003 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	Bhutan
1980s	0.0004 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	Bhutan
1990s	0.0005 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	0.0003 units per square kilometre	Bhutan
2000s	0.0005 units per square kilometre	0.0003 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	Bhutan
2010s	0.0005 units per square kilometre	0.0004 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Bhutan or Kuwait?: Kuwait, at 0.0004 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Bhutan and Kuwait?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Kuwait?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Kuwait rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square?: Bhutan ranks 152nd and Kuwait ranks 151st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Kuwait: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/kuwait/">Bhutan vs Kuwait: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.