American Samoa vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

American Samoa
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
American Samoa rank
191st
Equatorial Guinea rank
190th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • American Samoa
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000196119902019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in American Samoa, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 33.0 times American Samoa's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

American Samoa ranks 191st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th of 206 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square, American Samoa or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in American Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square between American Samoa and Equatorial Guinea?
0 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Equatorial Guinea?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do American Samoa and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
American Samoa ranks 191st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/equatorial-guinea/">American Samoa vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.