Belgium vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita
Belgium
0 units per person
in 2019
Eswatini
0 units per person
in 2019
Belgium rank
62nd
Eswatini rank
61st
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita over time
- Belgium
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 62nd and Eswatini ranks 61st of 206 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per capita, Belgium or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Belgium as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per capita between Belgium and Eswatini?
- 0 units per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eswatini?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Eswatini rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per capita?
- Belgium ranks 62nd and Eswatini ranks 61st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.