What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?

0 units per person, with Rwanda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita

Antigua and Barbuda

0 units per person

in 2019

Rwanda

0 units per person

in 2019

Antigua and Barbuda rank

152nd

Rwanda rank

151st

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita over time

Antigua and Barbuda
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0 units per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 152nd and Rwanda ranks 151st of 206 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Antigua and Barbuda	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Antigua and Barbuda
1970s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Antigua and Barbuda
1980s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Antigua and Barbuda
1990s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Antigua and Barbuda
2000s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Antigua and Barbuda
2010s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?: 0 units per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - ipcc agriculture, per capita?: Antigua and Barbuda ranks 152nd and Rwanda ranks 151st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-ipcc-agriculture-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/rwanda/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,733 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.