Hong Kong vs Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land
Hong Kong
0.0011 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sudan
0.001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
104th
Sudan rank
107th
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land over time
- Hong Kong
- Sudan
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.0011 units per square kilometre against 0.001 units per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 104th and Sudan ranks 107th of 208 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land, Hong Kong or Sudan?
- Hong Kong, at 0.0011 units per square kilometre against 0.001 units per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land between Hong Kong and Sudan?
- 0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land?
- Hong Kong ranks 104th and Sudan ranks 107th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.