Eswatini vs Panama: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land
Eswatini
0 units per person
in 2019
Panama
0 units per person
in 2019
Eswatini rank
63rd
Panama rank
61st
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land over time
- Eswatini
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 63rd and Panama ranks 61st of 208 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Panama |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Panama |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land, Eswatini or Panama?
- Panama, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land between Eswatini and Panama?
- 0 units per person, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Panama?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Panama rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land?
- Eswatini ranks 63rd and Panama ranks 61st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.