Ecuador vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land
Ecuador
0 units per person
in 2019
Serbia
0 units per person
in 2019
Ecuador rank
78th
Serbia rank
81st
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 81st of 208 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0 units per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - emissions on agricultural land?
- Ecuador ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 81st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Emissions on agricultural land divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.