Republic of Moldova vs Nicaragua: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues

Republic of Moldova
1.84
in 2050
Nicaragua
1.49
in 2050
Republic of Moldova rank
68th
Nicaragua rank
70th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Nicaragua
0.511.52196120052050

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 1.84 against 1.49 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.35.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 70th of 186 countries.

Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 1.34 0.8181 0.517 Republic of Moldova
2000s 1.64 1.15 0.4922 Republic of Moldova
2010s 1.63 1.13 0.5028 Republic of Moldova
2030s 1.75 1.44 0.3081 Republic of Moldova
2050s 1.84 1.49 0.3577 Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - burning - crop residues, Republic of Moldova or Nicaragua?
Republic of Moldova, at 1.84 against 1.49 in Nicaragua as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - burning - crop residues between Republic of Moldova and Nicaragua?
0.35, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Nicaragua?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Republic of Moldova and Nicaragua rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - burning - crop residues?
Republic of Moldova ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 70th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Nicaragua: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-burning-crop-residues/moldova/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-ch4-burning-crop-residues/moldova/nicaragua/">Republic of Moldova vs Nicaragua: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 10,039 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).