Maldives vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues, per
Maldives
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Maldives rank
151st
South Sudan rank
148th
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues, per over time
- Maldives
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 151st and South Sudan ranks 148th of 184 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - burning - crop residues, per, Maldives or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - burning - crop residues, per between Maldives and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - burning - crop residues, per?
- Maldives ranks 151st and South Sudan ranks 148th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.