Greenland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - AFOLU, annual growth rate
Greenland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Turks and Caicos Islands
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
Greenland rank
197th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
197th
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - AFOLU, annual growth rate over time
- Greenland
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Greenland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 197th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 197th of 201 countries.
Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (ch4) - afolu, annual growth rate, Greenland or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Greenland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2018.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (ch4) - afolu, annual growth rate between Greenland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Greenland and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - afolu, annual growth rate?
- Greenland ranks 197th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 197th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - AFOLU, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - AFOLU. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.