Cuba vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Cuba
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Nepal
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Cuba rank
28th
Nepal rank
26th

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Cuba
  • Nepal
0000196119902019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 28th and Nepal ranks 26th of 190 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Cuba or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Cuba and Nepal?
0 units per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nepal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Cuba and Nepal rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Cuba ranks 28th and Nepal ranks 26th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/cuba/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/cuba/nepal/">Cuba vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.