Belgium vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Belgium
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Belgium rank
45th
South Sudan rank
48th
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time
- Belgium
- South Sudan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 45th and South Sudan ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Belgium or South Sudan?
- Belgium, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Belgium and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
- Belgium ranks 45th and South Sudan ranks 48th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.