Kiribati vs Macao: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Kiribati
0 % change on previous year
in 2019
Macao
0 % change on previous year
in 2019
Kiribati rank
125th
Macao rank
125th

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Kiribati
  • Macao
-250255075100196219902019

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Macao, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Macao ahead.

Kiribati ranks 125th and Macao ranks 125th of 191 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Macao in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Macao Difference Ahead
1970s 0 % change on previous year 3.69 % change on previous year 3.69 % change on previous year Macao
1980s 0 % change on previous year 0.5235 % change on previous year 0.5235 % change on previous year Macao
1990s 0 % change on previous year 3.25 % change on previous year 3.25 % change on previous year Macao
2000s 10 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year 8.69 % change on previous year Kiribati
2010s 5 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year 3.47 % change on previous year Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Kiribati or Macao?
Kiribati, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Macao as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Kiribati and Macao?
0 % change on previous year, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Macao?
49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2019.
How do Kiribati and Macao rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Kiribati ranks 125th and Macao ranks 125th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Macao: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-annual-growth-rate/kiribati/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-annual-growth-rate/kiribati/macao-sar-china/">Kiribati vs Macao: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,015 data points, 1962–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.