Afghanistan vs Mongolia: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils

Afghanistan
2.12
in 2050
Mongolia
1.92
in 2050
Afghanistan rank
45th
Mongolia rank
46th

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Mongolia
0.511.522.5196120052050

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 2.12 against 1.92 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.2.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 45th and Mongolia ranks 46th of 192 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9739 1.05 0.0751 Mongolia
1970s 0.969 1.16 0.1927 Mongolia
1980s 0.7938 1.21 0.4165 Mongolia
1990s 0.7972 1.44 0.6472 Mongolia
2000s 0.8821 1.37 0.4844 Mongolia
2010s 1.14 2.02 0.8768 Mongolia
2030s 1.49 1.77 0.2734 Mongolia
2050s 2.12 1.92 0.1923 Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, Afghanistan or Mongolia?
Afghanistan, at 2.12 against 1.92 in Mongolia as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils between Afghanistan and Mongolia?
0.2, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Mongolia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Afghanistan and Mongolia rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils?
Afghanistan ranks 45th and Mongolia ranks 46th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Mongolia: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils/afghanistan/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils/afghanistan/mongolia/">Afghanistan vs Mongolia: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).