Argentina vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per
Argentina
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Argentina rank
102nd
South Sudan rank
101st
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time
- Argentina
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Argentina ranks 102nd and South Sudan ranks 101st of 193 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per, Argentina or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per between Argentina and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per?
- Argentina ranks 102nd and South Sudan ranks 101st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.