Belarus vs Latvia: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per
Belarus
0 units per person
in 2019
Latvia
0 units per person
in 2019
Belarus rank
23rd
Latvia rank
26th
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time
- Belarus
- Latvia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 23rd and Latvia ranks 26th of 193 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per, Belarus or Latvia?
- Belarus, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per between Belarus and Latvia?
- 0 units per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Latvia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Latvia rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per?
- Belarus ranks 23rd and Latvia ranks 26th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.