Ecuador vs United States: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural

Ecuador
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
United States
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Ecuador rank
100th
United States rank
98th

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural over time

  • Ecuador
  • United States
000000199020042019

How they compare

United States currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United States ahead.

Ecuador ranks 100th and United States ranks 98th of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and United States in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United States Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural, Ecuador or United States?
United States, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural between Ecuador and United States?
0 units per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United States?
30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and United States rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural?
Ecuador ranks 100th and United States ranks 98th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs United States: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-emissions-on-agricultural-land-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-emissions-on-agricultural-land-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/">Ecuador vs United States: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 5,639 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.