Colombia vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural
Colombia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Colombia rank
99th
South Sudan rank
101st
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural over time
- Colombia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 99th and South Sudan ranks 101st of 193 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural, Colombia or South Sudan?
- Colombia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural between Colombia and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Colombia and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural?
- Colombia ranks 99th and South Sudan ranks 101st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.