Botswana vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per

Botswana
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Botswana rank
184th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
186th

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time

  • Botswana
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
00000196119902019

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 2.0 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 184th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 186th of 193 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Botswana or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Botswana, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Botswana and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0 units per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Democratic Republic of Congo?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
Botswana ranks 184th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 186th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-dem-rep/">Botswana vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,337 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.